phoneCall Now for a Free Case Evaluation - 800-611-7080
Seedol.com > News > John Ray

Nuvaring Lawsuit Cases Continue to Be Filed

May 3, 2013 by
Nuvaring Lawsuit Cases

Nuvaring Lawsuit Cases

Nuvaring Lawsuit cases continue to be filed on behalf of women who suffered side effects related to blood clots as well as women who suffered internal injuries as a result of migration of the Nuvaring device.

Motions are already being heard in the first Nuvaring Lawsuit trials. The outcome of these first Nuvaring Lawsuit trials could impact when and if the maker of Nuvaring decides to offer Nuvaring Lawsuit settlements to women who have filed Nuvaring cases.

Is there a Nuvaring Class Action Lawsuit?

The question often arises, is there a Nuvaring Class Action Lawsuit? To the best of our knowledge there is no Nuvaring Class Action Lawsuit currently underway. There is, however, a Nuvaring Multidistrict Litigation. Class Action Lawsuits and Multdistrict Litigations are often confused as being the same thing. Although there would be similarities in a Nuvaring Class Action Lawsuit and a Nuvaring Multidistrict Litigation, the two types of mass lawsuits are not identical.

The existence of a Nuvaring Class Action Lawsuit or a Nuvaring Multidistrict Litigation does not effect any woman who has suffered an injury from the Nuvaring Birth Controls right to file an individual lawsuit. Women who wait to file their Nuvaring Lawsuit could face time limits that exist for filing any lawsuit.

If you were injured by the Nuvaring Birth Control Device, the best time to file your Nuvaring Lawsuit is now. The first step in filing a Nuvaring Case is to speak with a lawyer accepting clients for the Nuvaring Lawsuit case. You can speak with a lawyer that is accepting clients for the Nuvaring Lawsuit case by calling the toll free number on this page or by using the contact form above.

Nuvaring Lawsuit Settlements

If the maker of Nuvaring decides to offer settlements to women who have been injured by Nuvaring we will report that information at the time it is received.  In all likelihood there are still many women who suffered blood clot related injuries as well as injuries due to the migration of the Nuvaring Device that have yet to speak with a lawyer about  their case, if you are among these women we would encourage you not to wait to speak with a lawyer about  your case.

Filed Under: Breaking News, Featured, Nuvaring Lawsuit Tagged With: ,

How to Opt Out of the Visa MasterCard Lawsuit Proposed Settlement

April 19, 2013 by
Visa MasterCard Lawsuit

Visa MasterCard Lawsuit

Learn more about your rights in proposed settlement in the Visa MasterCard Antitrust Lawsuit entitled  In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation—the Visa Mastercard interchange fee antitrust settlement. Contact us today at our toll free number or use the contact form on this page.

Although giant retailers like Walmart, Target and Best Buy have already opted-out of the Visa and Master Card Antitrust settlement, thousands of businesses that process a large volume of credit card transactions are still without proper legal representation to evaluate and protect their rights in this settlement. Any business that processes at least twenty million dollars per year (or more) in Credit Card transactions should consider whether opting-out of the Visa MasterCard settlement is in their best financial interest. The deadline for opting out is May 28, 2013 and businesses that fail to opt out by that time could stand to lose potentially millions of dollars they may be entitled to.

Furthermore, the settlement in In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1720, allows Visa, Mastercard and every major bank to continue to do exactly what it is they have done all along: meet in secret and continue to set interchange rates as high as they want them to be.

How to Opt Out of the Visa Master Card Trust Settlement

If you are interested in discussing Opting Out of the Visa and MasterCard settlement offer and filing your own independent lawsuit on behalf of your business please contact or us today to discuss your potential case with our team of experienced Antitrust Lawyers.

The current settlement offer in the Visa MasterCard Antitrust Lawsuit is considered by many to be inherently unfair to businesses that process large amounts of Visa and Master Card Transactions. These businesses have suffered millions of dollars in damages due to the price-fixing conspiracy at Visa and Mastercard. Yet the settlement promises to pay a couple of pennies on the dollar. Massive retailers such as Walmart, Target and Best Buy obviously had no problem obtaining legal counsel to represent them. These retailers may process Visa and Master Card Transactions in the billions-of-dollars a year range. Businesses smaller than these mega-retailers that still process millions in credit card transactions have often not be able to find proper legal representation or the law firms they contacted were unwilling to accept their cases on a contingency fee basis meaning these business would have to spend a significant amount of money on legal fees to obtain representation.

Opting-Out without Paying Up Front Legal Fees

Our teams of experienced antitrust lawyers are accepting clients for the Visa Master Card Antitrust case on a contingency fee basis. This means that your business will not have to pay any upfront fees and our team only gets paid if we settle or win your case. We felt that offering this option to businesses that do not have the resources of Walmart, Target and Best Buy was the only way that many businesses could afford to have their rights protected and receive a fair settlement or jury award in this case.

If your business processed at least twenty million dollars per year between 2004 and today in Visa and Master Card Transactions, please contact us today on our toll free number or use the contact form on this page to receive a free legal consultation about protecting your rights in this case.

 

Filed Under: Breaking News, Featured, Visa MasterCard Lawsuit Tagged With: , ,

Mirena Lawsuit Plaintiffs Still Seeking Representation

April 4, 2013 by
Mirena Birth Control Lawsuits

Mirena Birth Control Lawsuits

A review of a facebook page created about Mirena Birth Control Lawsuits for those who have been injured by Mirena indicates that many of those injured by Mirena have been turned away by law firms that they have contacted about representing them and filing a Mirena Lawsuit on their behalf. Many of these women have turned to American Law Partners seeking legal representation.

Filing a Mirena Lawsuit

It is  important for women  who were injured by the Merina IUD to understand that just because one law firm declines to represent them, does not mean that another law firm will not take their case. Different law firms have different criteria for client acceptance in the Merina Lawsuit case as well as most other cases.

A denial of legal representation by one law firm should not be interpreted as an indication that a Mirena Injury victim does not have a case. If one law firm has declined to represent you in your Merina Lawsuit, you should not give up as another law firm may have different criteria for client acceptance than another your Merina Lawsuit  case may be accepted even if it was denied by another law firm.

Choosing a Mirena Lawsuit Lawyer

In choosing a lawyer to file your Mirena Lawsuit, it is best to speak with law firms that are heavily involved in the Mirena  Lawsuit case. When women contact law firms that are not deeply involved in the Mirena Lawsuit, the a potentially more likely to be denied representation.

It is also important to seek representation for a law firm heavily involved in the Merina IUD Litigation because these firms are more likely to be in a position to handle your Mirena Lawsuit case more efficiency and in many cases achieve a better outcome for you than a law firm that is not heavily involved in the Merina Lawsuit.

If you were injured by the Mirena IUD and have not spoken with a lawyer about filing a Merina Lawsuit, you should do so now. There is a time limit for filing any lawsuit and this applies to Merina Lawsuits. If you have spoken with a law firm about your potential  Merina Lawsuit and you have been denied representation by that firm, you should not give up on your potential case. We encourage you to be your own advocate and be persistent in finding a law firm that will accept you case.

 

Filed Under: Breaking News, Featured, Mirena Lawsuit Tagged With: , , ,

Meso Only Lawyers focus on Mesothelioma Lawsuits

April 1, 2013 by
Meso Only Mesothelioma Lawyer

Meso Only Mesothelioma Lawyer

If you have been diagnosed with Mesothelioma Cancer or another asbestos related cancer, you are not alone. As many as three to four thousand individuals are diagnosed with asbestos related cancers each year. The only known cause of Mesothelioma is exposure to asbestos. The primary way that individuals are exposed to asbestos is through occupational exposure in the work place.  Employers that exposed employees to Asbestos can be held liable though a Mesothelioma Lawsuit for damages caused to employees who develop mesothelioma.  Lawyers that focus their practice on Mesothelioma Lawsuits are often called mesothelioma lawyers or Meso-Only Lawyers

Meso Only Lawyers

Meso Only Lawyers or Mesothelioma Lawyers focus their legal practice on Mesothelioma Lawsuit cases filed on behalf of Mesothelioma victims and other victims of asbestos exposure that has resulted in a disease linked to asbestos.

Having your Mesothelioma Lawsuit filed by a Meso Only Lawyer or Mesothelioma Lawyer can be vital to the outcome of your case. Not all lawyers are familiar with the Mesothelioma or Mesothelioma Lawsuits. Mesothelioma Lawsuits can be extremely complex; Meso-Only Lawyers are often required to do extensive research to identify the employer that exposed a Mesothelioma Victim to asbestos. Once the employer or employers that exposed a Mesothelioma Cancer victim to asbestos are identified, the prosecution of a Mesothelioma Lawsuit is complex from a medical standpoint as well.

Even if an employer that exposed a Mesothelioma Victim to asbestos is no longer in business, recovering damages for a Mesothelioma Victim may still be possible. Due to the wide spread use of asbestos and resulting Mesothelioma Cancer in a large number of Americans, trust funds were created from the assets of employers that went out of business. Mesothelioma Claims can be filed against these trust funds to recover damages for employees who were exposed to asbestos by an employer that is no longer in business.

Filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit

The process of filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit begins by consulting with a Meso-Only or Mesothelioma Lawyer. In some cases the Mesothelioma Victim may have passed away as a result of their disease. In these cases the family of the Mesothelioma Victim may be eligible to file a Mesothelioma Lawsuit as a result of the loss of their loved one. Regardless of whether you are filing a Mesothelioma Lawsuit on your own behalf or as a result or due to the loss of a loved one, the first step in the process should be to consult with a Meso-Only Mesothelioma Lawyer.

Filed Under: Meso Only, Mesothelioma Lawsuit, Mesothelioma Lawyer Tagged With: , , , ,

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Likely to Continue far beyond 2013

March 15, 2013 by
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Report

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Report

The first  Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits have already been tried and to the best of our knowledge, the plaintiffs have won in all cases to date. Vaginal Mesh Class Action Lawsuits, or MDLs, are currently underway.  Verdicts have been handed down awarding those injured by Vaginal Mesh products with multimillion dollar monetary awards.

Although the first Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit trials have already occurred and numerous Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits are still outstanding, we believe many more Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits will be filed. A Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit does not become necessary until a woman who has had a Vaginal Mesh Implant actually has a problem with her Vaginal Mesh Product.

Given that Vaginal Mesh Implants are meant to be permanent, an implant can be in place for years before it becomes problematic and injures the woman. Many women who have vaginal mesh implants feel like they have a ticking time bomb inside them waiting to go off.

Vaginal Mesh Class Action Lawsuit 

There are several Vaginal Mesh Multidistrict Litigations currently underway. These group litigations are often referred to as a Vaginal Mesh Class Action Lawsuit due to the fact that most people are more familiar with the term Class Action Lawsuit than the term Multidistrict Litigation.

A Vaginal Mesh Multidistrict Litigation is similar to a Vaginal Mesh Class Action Lawsuit in many ways however, the two types of group litigation are not identical. Individual Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits may also be filed separately from the Multidistrict Litigations ongoing.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Settlements

The Multimillion dollar verdicts handed down in the first Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit trials could lead some Vaginal Mesh Implant makers currently facing lawsuits to offer settlements.  As of yet we are unaware of any Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit manufacturer electing to begin offering Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit settlements however, this does not mean that any of these manufacturers of Vaginal Mesh products may not decide to being offering Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Settlements in the near future.

The prospect of facing a large number of Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit trials could be sufficient incentive for Vaginal Mesh manufacturers to conclude that they would be better served offering Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Settlements, than facing the expense of a large number of trials in which juries may continue to hand down multimillion dollar awards to the women who have been injured by their products.

 

Filed Under: Breaking News, Featured, Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Tagged With: , ,

Mirena Lawsuit Report, Hearing for Mirena Class Action Lawsuit

March 15, 2013 by
Mirena Lawsuit Report

Mirena Lawsuit Report

More Mirena Lawsuits continue to be filed as women come forward who have been injured by the Mirena as a Mirena Class Action Lawsuit develops. The Mirena Lawsuit cases being filed over complications from the Mirena IUD differ in significant ways from most of the other birth control lawsuits that are currently being filed.

Birth Control Lawsuit such as the Mirena Case were among the most often filed lawsuits against drug and medical device makers in 2012. We expect that trend to continue into 2013. In addition to the birth control lawsuits which were filed in 2012, Vaginal Mesh or Bladder Sling Lawsuits were also filed in large numbers. All of these cases are similar in that they involve the female reproductive system to one extent or another. Although the cases filed over Birth Control products and Transvaginal Mesh Products have similarities, the cases are unique in as many ways as they are similar.

Mirena Class Action Lawsuit Update

A hearing is set for later this month to determine whether or not a Mirena Multidistrict Litigation will be formed. The Mirena Lawsuit Multidistrict Litigation is often referred to as the Mirena Class Action Lawsuit, although the two types of litigation do differ.

New independent Mirena Lawsuit cases continue to be filed across the United States. Most of these Mirena Lawsuit cases are being filed as a result of injuries sustained when the Mirena IUD moves from the position where it is implanted. All or part of the Mirena IUD can move to other parts of the woman’s reproductive system and even beyond. The device or parts of the Mirena IUD device can cause punctures, tears and blockages in organs and other tissues. These punctures tears and blockages can lead to infection as well as a number of other complications. Some of the complications from the Mirena IUD can be fatal.

 

Mirena Lawsuit Resource Link

http://www.jbenj.com/mirena

 

Filed Under: Breaking News, Featured, Mirena Lawsuit Tagged With: , ,

Mesothelioma Lawyers continue the fight for Mesothelioma Lawsuit Plaintiffs

March 8, 2013 by
Mesothelioma Lawsuit Breaking News

Mesothelioma Lawsuit Breaking News

Mesothelioma Lawyer groups continue to fight for Mesothelioma Lawsuit plaintiffs in the present as well as the future.  A continued effort by elected officials to make it more difficult for Mesothelioma Cancer victims to receive compensation is ongoing.  This effort is part of an a larger effort known as “Tort Reform”  a tort is simply a wrong committed by one party against another.

Oddly, the elected officials pushing  “Tort Reform” are not attempting to reform the large companies that commit torts like exposing clients to Asbestos, they are trying to protect these companies from having to compensate those that they harmed.  This actually should not come as a surprise. Many of the companies that exposed employees to Asbestos are among the world’s largest corporations. These companies can form special interest political groups and provide major financing for Politicians in their bid to get elected and continue to get re-elected.  These corporations can also afford to hire lobbyist to wine and dine politicians and give them other perks that the victims of asbestos exposure can not.

Mesothelioma Lawyers are Putting Up a Fight

Although no Law Firm in the U.S. has a fraction of the resources of many of the corporations that exposed their employees to Asbestos, Mesothelioma Lawyer groups are banning together to put up a fight on behalf of current Mesothelioma Cancer Victims filing Mesothelioma Lawsuits as well as those who will develop Mesothelioma Cancer in the future.  Although the corporations that are commonly the defendant in Mesothelioma Lawsuit cases may be more well-funded in their efforts to deny justice to employees they exposed to asbestos, they are not more resolved.  In many ways this is a David and Goliath situation however, we all know how that story ended.

Mesothelioma Lawyers will continue to put up a good fight on behalf of present and future Mesothelioma Lawsuit plaintiffs. If you or a family member worked in an industry where employees were exposed to Asbestos, join the fight. Call your State Representatives, your Congressmen and Senators and remind them who they work for.

Mesothelioma Lawsuits – Protect Your Rights

Special interest groups can fund their campaigns but they cannot stay in office without winning votes. It’s time to remind those we elect to Govern us that we gave them their job and we can take it away from them. It’s time for them to start reforming the employers that committed the tort of exposing employees to Asbestos and stop trying to protect those employers in the name of “ Tort Reform”.

Filed Under: Breaking News, Featured, Mesothelioma Lawsuit, Mesothelioma Lawyer Tagged With: , ,

Stryker Hip Lawsuit Breaking News Report

March 8, 2013 by
Stryker Hip Lawsuit Breaking News

Stryker Hip Lawsuit Breaking News

Stryker Hip Lawsuit Breaking News Report:  In July 2012, Stryker recalled its Rejuvenate and ABG II modular neck hip stems.  Because of this Stryker Hip Recall, Stryker Hip Lawsuit cases are progressing with consolidation in the New Jersey Superior Court, Bergen County, Case 296.   A case management conference in March 2013 has been scheduled regarding the Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Stem and the ABG II Modular Hip Stem litigation.  The developments in this litigation are welcome by all who suffered premature failure of their Stryker Hip Implant and other medical complications that could follow.

It is known that there are many factors and reasons for failure in individuals with certain hip implants.  They can include dislocation, infection, loosening as well as harmful biological responses.  Specialized testing should be done for metal ion levels along with imaging.  The Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II Modular Neck hip stem systems have had growing legal problems attributed to complaints from thousands of patients who had the medical devices implanted.  Unlike other hip implants that have a one piece neck and stem, these two Stryker Hips include several components.  Their use was intended to give orthopedic surgeons more flexibility with implants that could be custom fitted.  The parts are manufactured with a titanium alloy blend to reduce corrosion and fretting.  Disappointingly, facts did end up exposing evidence of these two serious side effects.  A Stryker Hip Recall later occurred.  This has led to numerous Stryker Lawsuit cases being filed against the manufacturer.  Loosening of the implant and release of toxic metals caused many individuals serious Stryker Hip Side Effects.

Many patients with Stryker Hip Implants do not know that both of these systems were submitted through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s 510(k) premarket notification process.  With this program, drugs or medical devices do not have to undergo clinical trials as long as the product is similar enough to a product that has already received FDA approval.  That was the case with both of these hip systems.  Therefore, safety does not have to be proven in advance.  Flaws are found only after they have been implanted in patients.

If you have experienced complications such as pain at the surgical site, squeaking or grinding sound from replaced joint, infection after surgery or difficulty in walking, a skilled Stryker Hip Lawyer may assist you in pursuing potential financial compensation through a Stryker Hip Lawsuit for your medical costs and pain and suffering.

 

Filed Under: Breaking News, Featured, Stryker Hip Lawsuit Tagged With: , ,

Mass Torts Made Perfect Conference to Be Held in April 2013

February 28, 2013 by

 

Mass Torts Made Perfect

Mass Torts Made Perfect

Mike Papantonio published a message to plaintiff lawyers inviting them to attend the Mass Torts Made Perfect Conference at the Wynn Hotel in Las Vegas April 10th through the 12th.  Mass Torts Made Perfect is the premier organization for disseminating information for Mass Tort Law Firms about ongoing Mass Tort cases. Mass Tort Made Perfect conferences are also a great networking opportunity.

 

Register Here

 

 The following is the message from Mike Papantonio published by Mass Torts made Perfect

I am looking forward to seeing you all at our next Mass Torts Made Perfect Conference April 10-12, 2013. Once again, we look forward to hosting the top trial lawyers in the country, both mass-tort and single-event attorneys who understand that referrals, relationships and knowledge built up in Las Vegas, most certainly don’t stay in Vegas.

Like we have in the past, we are hosting the names you know in litigation, such as Howard Nations, Morris Dees and other legends, and the people you want to meet during the breaks and receptions. We have comedian Lewis Black performing this year, as well as mentalist Lior Suchard, who will amaze you. We also will be hosting talk radio star Thom Hartmann, syndicated columnist Karl Frisch and bestselling author Cliff Schecter. In the past we have been visited by Bill Clinton, Dan Rather, Bill Maher, Pete Rose, Bobby Kennedy, Jr., Terry Bradshaw, Al Sharpton, Jason Alexander, Harry Reid, Ted Koppel, Wanda Sykes, James Carville, Ed Schultz, Paul Begala and many other names you know, as well as other talents you may not. Yet.

If you’re interested in knowing what is really happening with GranuFlo, SSRIs, Pradaxa, Actos, Pelvic Mesh, DePuy, as well as Meningitis, Mirena, Fosamax Femur, Medtronic INFUSE, and many other important litigations, you can’t miss out hearing from the leaders in these areas – they come to MTMP to educate and share information – period. There are no defense attorneys at MTMP, so we are able to give real, concrete and substantive presentations that will help you win your case.

I’m also proud to be hosting the first MTMP Auction to benefit the American Association for Justice’s “Take Justice Back” media campaign. The AAJ is an incredibly important organization and they fight every day to protect your ability to practice your profession, from those who would undermine you and the people of this country with frivolous laws such as so-called “tort reform.” Supporting the AAJ is the right thing to do – I hope you will come out Thursday night, April 11 at the Wynn Hotel, and help us raise much-needed funding for this important effort.

Come to mass torts and improve your practice. Come to mass torts and meeting living legal legends. Come to mass torts and network with your fellow attorneys, and spend some time with our impressive guests. Come to mass torts, where plaintiff’s lawyers learn to win.

I hope to see you there at the lovely Wynn Hotel at the opening night Gala Reception at the XS Nightclub on Wednesday, April 10. Please register and join us!

 

–

Filed Under: Breaking News, Featured, Mass Tort News Tagged With: , ,

Yaz Lawsuit cases filed due to amputations and other blood clot injuries

February 25, 2013 by
Yaz Lawsuit Due to Side Effects

Yaz Lawsuit Due to Side Effects

02/25/2013  Yaz Lawsuit Update on Amputations and other injuries due to Yaz Side Effects: Yaz blood clots may lead to amputation say Yaz Lawsuit News reports. The effects of a thrombolytic event can be devastating. In some instances, a blood clot in a deep vein (DVT) could result in amputation of that limb. It has been reported that a 37 year old wife and mother living in Oklahoma, filed a Yaz lawsuit claiming she developed a Yaz blood clot and had an emergency amputation of her arm.

Reports abound of studies linking Yaz to potentially serious blood clots including DVTs and pulmonary embolism (PE). The ultimate, potentially deadly effects of blood clots on the body include heart attack and stroke. A pulmonary embolism, depending on severity can mean taking medications including blood thinners for the remainder of a potentially shortened lifespan. One side effect of a DVT that is not often mentioned is the real possibility of amputation.

A vascular Web article explains phlegmasia cerulea dolens, a rare form of DVT and the potential for amputation if it occurs. “Phlegmasia cerulea dolens, if not adequately treated, can cause gangrene, which is tissue death and occurs when tissues in your body do not receive enough oxygen and blood. Gangrene is very serious and can lead to amputation.”

Yaz Lawsuit Settlements and Amounts

In 2012 Bayer began the Yaz lawsuit settlements process but have not admitted wrong doing. In fact, the products remain on the market and continue to be promoted by Bayer. There has been no Yaz recall but there does not have to be a Yaz or Yasmin recall to file a Yaz lawsuit or potentially be entitled to a Yaz lawsuit settlement if you have suffered injury potentially related to the drugs. Reported Yaz Lawsuit Settlement amounts currently range in the two hundred thousand to two hundred and fifty thousand dollar range on average. This is an average, some Yaz Lawsuit Settlements  could exceed one million dollars.

Yaz Lawsuit and Commerical Marketing

Yaz is a birth control pill that at one time was marketed heavily by Bayer Pharmaceuticals as a treatment for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) and acne. The claims made by Bayer about Yaz and Yasmin made the two oral contraceptives very popular among women. Later, Bayer was accused of over-stating the effectiveness of the birth control for treatment of PMDD.

The national Institutes of Health describe PMDD: “Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is a condition in which a woman has severe depression symptoms, irritability, and tension before menstruation. The symptoms of PMDD are more severe than those seen with premenstrual syndrome (PMS)” Allegedly, Yaz and Yasmin are more effective for PMS than for PMDD.

Women that have taken Yaz or Yasmin for any of the approved reasons and suffered a potentially serious blood clot while taking Yaz may be entitled to file a Yaz lawsuit and may be entitled to a Yaz settlement. However; for some women, time may be running out due to certain State and Federal regulations governing the amount of time allowed during which a Yaz lawsuit can be filed. Only a knowledge Yaz lawyer can fully explain your options.

 

Citations

http://www.vascularweb.org/vascularhealth/pages/deep-vein-thrombosis-%28-dvt-%29-.aspxhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0004461/

Filed Under: Breaking News, Featured, Yaz Lawsuit Tagged With: , , ,