(courtesy photo)

Crestor side effectsseem to be reported more and more as a result of the danger that is associated with taking the cholesterol reducing drug. One such side effect of Crestor includes kidney problems. For example, it has been reported that people are likely to suffer from kidney problems as much as 75 times more when compared to other cholesterol lowering drugs. Even more so, Public Citizen, a non-profit consumer advocacy group, brought notice of the six reported incidents of acute kidney failure or damage per each million Crestor prescriptions given out. It seems that Crestor use is significantly more dangerous than any other statin medications.
Dangerous side effects of Crestor unfortunately include the potentially fatal disease called Rhabdomyolysis. This condition can start as something that is simply minor with what seems to be just muscle aches, but Crestor muscle pain can eventually result in death. Rhabdomyolysis can cause severe and total muscle degeneration. This degeneration of the muscles floods the bloodstream with their contents, such as Myoglobin, a protein that is contained in muscle cells. If enough Myoglobin is spilled into the bloodstream, it can obstruct the kidney’s filtering system and lead to kidney failure. It is believed that serious danger is associated between Crestor and side effects, some of which could even cause death.
Yet another serious Crestor side effect that people can suffer from includes cardiac arrest. This can happen due to the dangerous level of potassium that is being released by the decaying muscles into the blood. A Public Citizen member states that Crestor medication is the only statin drug to cause primary renal failure. This member further states that the danger from renal or kidney failure can be as much as 75 times more when compared to every other statin drug combined.
Crestor has a questionable history both before and after it was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The approval took a year longer than expected because the FDA looked into allegations of extremely dangerous effects of Crestor including Rhabdomyolysis. The FDA and the manufacturer of the drug, AstraZeneca, determined the dosage during testing was too high and these higher doses could lead to dangerous side effects. The drug company has since lowered its dosage recommendations. It is still important to be cautious of the side effects of Crestor 5 mg and 10 mg.

The post Crestor Danger appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Crestor attorneys. Many people are filing Crestor lawsuits because of the serious and negative association between Crestor and side effects that may result from its use. Just a few months after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug for distribution, seven patients who had taken Crestor reported developing a life-threatening condition called Rhabdomyolysis. In 2004, a 39 year old woman was reported to have developed this condition and died. In addition, nine patients were reported to have suffered from severe kidney damage. All of these patients reported taking Crestor in order to help with their high cholesterol levels.
Drug related lawsuits are being brought into the spotlight because of the recent Vioxx trial and award. There are some people that may be hesitant when considering whether to pursue a Crestor lawsuit, because they might not realize their symptoms or diseases could be a direct result of the drug. These people may not fully understand their legal rights as patients and should consider contacting a Crestor lawyer for more information if they have been directly affected by the negative effects of Crestor. You should also consider contacting a Crestor attorney for a free consultation if you or someone you know has suffered from any Crestor side effects.
AstraZeneca, the manufacturer of Crestor medication, recently relabeled its medicine to include a Crestor warning regarding its use. However, even with the updated warning, people are still filing two main lawsuits against Crestor, an individual lawsuit or a Crestor class action lawsuit. The latter is filed if a large group of people, seeking monetary compensation for their damages, sues AstraZeneca. In this case, all the plaintiffs will share in the settlement awarded.
In all cases, Crestor related lawsuits should be pursued if there are distinct side effects of Crestor medication. The first step is to contact one of the many Crestor lawyers available to help you. They will be able to assist you by answering any questions you have, giving you any additional information, as well as evaluating your case to determine if you are eligible to file a lawsuit.

The post Crestor Lawsuits Being Filed appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Crestor, known in its generic form as rosuvastatin, is one of the leading cholesterol medications on the market. The pharmaceutical company, AstraZeneca, is the manufacturer of the drug. Cholesterol medications are needed because of a growing public health problem. In fact, a number of different pharmaceutical companies have produced medications that were intended to lower levels of cholesterol to reduce dangerous health risks. Crestor medication has been marketed as the strongest cholesterol prescription drug on the market since its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2003.
Crestor is currently available today only as a prescription medication. The cholesterol reducing medication works by entering the liver and lowering the levels of LDL cholesterol, which is most commonly referred to as “bad” cholesterol. This particular type of cholesterol has been known to lead to serious health risks such as serious heart damage, heart attacks and strokes. While the intended use of this drug is positive, not long after the drug was on the market, many people began reporting serious and dangerous Crestor side effects shortly after taking the medication. Remarkably, the negative effects of Crestor were brought to light only two months after the drug was released to the public. These side effects of Crestor were becoming far too common considering the number of patients taking the cholesterol drug. The public began to take notice and contact defective drug attorneys or Crestor attorneys as a result.
Several patients who have taken the cholesterol reducing drug developed life-threatening and harmful side effects for Crestor. It was reported that seven patients developed Rhabdomyolysis just a few months after the FDA approved the drug. Another side effect of Crestor that developed was kidney damage. Nine different patients suffered severe kidney damage after taking the prescription drug.
An individual who has taken Crestor and been affected by a Crestor side effect may seek legal action in the form of a Crestor lawsuit if they have been injured from taking the drug. Individuals are encouraged to contact Crestor lawyers for a consultation

The post Crestor Side Effects and Settlements appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Crestordistribution was delayed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because of concerns regarding the association between Crestor and side effects, more specifically, the side effects associated with the 80 milligram dosage. The FDA told AstraZeneca, the manufacturer of Crestor, that it would need to resolve the agency’s concerns. Particularly, the FDA was concerned about the side effects of Crestor including the potential kidney and muscle damage risk. These side effects Crestorwould need to be addressed before being granted approval for sale in the U.S. Crestor is considered to be a statin which is associated with rare incidents of Rhabdomyolysis. The specific Crestor side effect is a breakdown of muscle cells. Before approval, AstraZeneca indicated in studies that seven people developed this potentially deadly disease in different studies.
Public Citizen, a non-profit consumer advocacy group, claims that Crestor side effects are so severe that a Crestor recall needs to be issued. They further assert that the FDA should never have approved the Crestor medication in the first place because of the seven episodes of severe negative effects of Crestorthat were reported during the drug’s initial trial phase. Even though Rhabdomyolysis was shown to be a side effect of Crestor during the initial trial phase, it was still approved for the market by the FDA.
Not only is Rhabdomyolysis a known side effect, but there are other side effects for Crestor to be aware of. The rate of reported kidney problems is about 75 times higher with Crestor compared to all other statin drugs. Public Citizen did an analysis and determined there had been 6.4 reports of acute kidney failure or kidney damage for every one million Crestor prescriptions filled.
Side effects of Crestor medication could prove to be crippling or even deadly. If you have incurred any injuries as a result of taking Crestor, you should consider contacting a Crestor lawyer. They may be able to help you seek monetary compensation through a Crestor lawsuit if you are eligible. They will then be able to give you guidance to follow through with the lawsuit.

The post Crestor Side Effects appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Topamax recall. Topamax medication is used as an anti-seizure drug for those who have been diagnosed with epilepsy. Of much interest lately are the ongoing issues regarding the Topamax side effects that may occur when women use Topamax during their pregnancy. It has been suggested that women who take Topamax during the first three months of their pregnancy are at an increased risk of having a child with a Topamax birth defect. Currently, the manufacturers of the anti-seizure medication have a voluntary recall going on.
A voluntary recall of two lots of Topamax 100mg tablets was initiated by the Ortho-McNeil Neurologics, Division of Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. because of four consumer reports of an uncharacteristic odor associated with the tablets that was thought to be caused by trace amounts of TBA (2,4,6 tribromoanisole). Ortho-McNeil identified TBA as the byproduct of a chemical preservative. This preservative is sometimes applied to wood that is used in the construction of pallets. It is thought that the Topamax medication was stored on wood pallets that were treated with the preservative thus allowing for TBA to be absorbed. To try and reduce the potential for future TBA contamination, suppliers are now required to verify that they do not use pallets made from chemically-treated wood. Also, the company is working with peer companies to better understand how and where TBA could potentially enter and impact the product and what can be done in the future to further mitigate the problem. Topamax is still being examined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because of the risk for Topamax birth defect. The link between Topamax and pregnancy has been of much concern because of the suggested increased risks for children being born with a Topamax cleft lip. Studies using human data have found the suggested risk. Because of this, the FDA moved Topamax from Pregnancy Category “C” to “D” to hopefully alert the public for the potential risk of experiencing some of the side effects of Topamax.
It is encouraged that if your child suffers from a side effect of Topamax to contact a Topamax birth defects lawyer as soon as possible.

The post Topamax Recall appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Topamax warnings were issued in a letter by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about the possible risks for developing Topamax side effects . Although the Topamax FDA warning was released, there is a possibility that some women still gave birth to children suffering from Topamax birth defects because they were not aware of the warning. The warning was meant to alert women about the link between pregnancy and Topamax. Studies have suggested that babies who are exposed to Topamax while in the womb are at an increased risk of being born with birth defects.
The Topamax warning informed the public of changing Topamax category from Pregnancy Category C to Pregnancy Category D. For a drug to be in Pregnancy Category C, it means animal reproduction studies have shown an adverse effect on the fetus and there are no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans. When a drug is in Pregnancy Category D, however, it means that there are controlled studies involving humans that indicate an increased risk of birth defects. Therefore, Pregnancy Category D suggests that there is a high risk for developing Topamax birth defects. The change in category came as a result of the FDA reviewing data collected from the North American Antiepileptic Drug (AED) Pregnancy Registry. The data suggested an increased risk for the side effects of Topamax such as a cleft lip and cleft palate when the infants were exposed to the drug during the early stages of pregnancy.
It is possible for a Topamax cleft lip to be treated with surgery. Families who have had children with cleft lips or cleft palates are encouraged and advised to contact a Topamax lawyer to discuss all of their legal options. Regardless whether your child is now doing well, other factors such as pain and suffering, out-of-pocket expenses, items insurance doesn’t cover and trauma should all be considered. Mothers who combined the use of Topamax and pregnancy, and then gave birth to a child with a birth defect as a result, should contact a Topamax birth defects attorney as soon as possible to receive guidance on all the necessary steps to take.

The post The Long Term Effects of Topamax appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Topamax birth defects may occur if Topamax is taken during pregnancy. More specifically, the chances of a baby being born with an oral cleft lip or an oral cleft palate are incredibly increased when Topamax is taken during pregnancy. Needless to say, Topamax and pregnancy is not a good combination. The medication can interfere with development of the lip or palate causing Topamax birth defects in the form of cleft palates and cleft lips. These however are not the only side effects to be familiar with.
In addition to these Topamax side effects , the following are other side effects that, if worsen, a doctor should be notified: tingling arms and legs, nausea, loss of appetite, tiredness, diarrhea, weight loss and change in taste. There are also more side effects of Topamax that should patients experience any of them, their doctor should be called immediately. They are as follows: decreased sweating, sleepiness, increased body temperature, kidney stones, decreased eye pressure, dizziness, confusion and difficulty concentrating. Topamax has the possibility to lower a patient’s bicarbonate level in the blood, thus causing an increase in acidity or metabolic acidosis. As a result, hyperventilation, tiredness, loss of appetite, irregular heartbeat, or changes in the level of alertness an individual has may appear as a Topamax side effect.
Mental health should be monitored while using Topamax. A side effect of Topamax may include depression and suicidal thoughts. Topamax may also decrease the effects of birth control. Patients should consult their healthcare professional about what alternative methods of contraception they could potentially use to prevent an unwanted pregnancy. Patients treated with this prescription medication may also experience some different side effects of Topamax such as back pain, abdominal pain, stomach pain, pain while urinating and bloody or dark urine. These symptoms could serve as possible signs of kidney stones.
If you have experienced any of the abovementioned symptoms, and feel that they have had debilitating effects on your day to day living, contact a Topamax lawyer. They may be able to evaluate your situation and circumstances and give guidance as to whether or not to pursue a Topamax lawsuit.

The post Side Effects of Topamax appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Crestor lawsuits are occurring as a direct result of the side effects of Crestor medication. Crestor is also known as rosuvastatin. The medication falls into a group of drugs called HMG CoA reductase inhibitors, also known as “statins”. It is used as a cholesterol reducing drug. The drug works to reduce the levels of triglycerides (types of fat) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL), or “bad” cholesterol, in the blood while at the same time increasing the levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or “good” cholesterol. In addition, it is also used to reduce the risk of strokes and heart attacks, as well as reduce the risk of other heart complications in those who have been diagnosed with diabetes, coronary heart disease, or other risk factors. Obviously, Crestor medication is used to help those with the chance of developing atherosclerosis and other heart diseases, but some detrimental Crestor side effectshave led to lawsuits against AstraZeneca, the manufacturer of Crestor.
A lawsuit in Illinois was filed by a woman who was suing AstraZeneca. She claimed that AstraZeneca’s drug, Crestor, was responsible for her mother’s death. These types of incidents are known as Crestor deaths. The daughter claims that as a result of a direct Crestor side effect, her mother died. The daughter also claims that her mother started taking Crestor in 2003, and during that time, she developed hematuria. Later on that year, the mother was admitted to the hospital after a fall. The doctors found blood in her urine and damage to her kidneys. The daughter claims that side effects for Crestorincluded her mother’s hematuria, renal failure and ultimately caused her mother’s death. The daughter seeks recovery for strict products liability for a defective design and for failure to warn, negligent design, negligent failure to warn, fraudulent concealment, common law fraud, breach of implied and express warranties and negligent misrepresentation.
If you or someone you know has suffered from a side effect of Crestor, you should contact a Crestor lawyer for an evaluation of your claim and guidance on where to go from here.

The post Crestor Lawsuit in Pennsylvania appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

It was a beautiful day in Queens, New York when a 59 year old woman felt her thigh bone snap while jumping rope with the neighborhood children. She recalled later how the severe pain caused her to fall to the ground as she came down from a jump.

The woman had been diagnosed with osteoporosis when she was just 48 and was taking Fosamax on a regular basis for the past eight years recalling that she had never had an incident prior to her current predicament. Fosamax is a commonly prescribed drug used in the treatment of osteoporosis and contains bisphosphonates, which is used to slow the loss of bone and increase bone mass. Concerns about some of the side effects Fosamax
have been increasing and now there is mounting evidence that women who have taken Fosamax for more than five years could be in danger of having fractures that are spontaneous in nature.

A resident of Castle Rock, Colorado and long time user of Fosamax claims that she has suffered from having broken her two femurs within the past ten years that she has been taking the medication. She voices her concern for the women who currently use Fosamax stating, “I’m sure there are a lot of women who have brittle bones right now that may be ready to break, and they’re not aware of it,” said the Colorado resident. “And my heart aches for them.” According to Dr. Kenneth Egol, a professor of orthopedic surgery at NYU Langone Medical Center, femur fractures have been occurring with more frequency over the last eighteen months. Many of the patients claim they were engaged in low-impact exercise when they suddenly experienced a break in the femur. What concerns Dr. Egol is that because the femur is known as one of the strongest bones in the body, it should not be susceptible to the types of damage that are becoming more and more frequent with Fosamax users. Yet, people taking a leisurely walk or walking down a flight of stairs are experiencing this type of injury. Dr. Egol further stated that upon reviewing the x-rays taken of his patients, the images take on the appearance of an injury suffered from a car accident rather than a minimal fall.

The post Femur Fractures Are Becoming Common Among Fosamax Users appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Crestor attorneys represent those that have been affected by taking the drug Crestor, also known as Rosuvastatin. Crestor medication was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2003. This medication restricts cholesterol production, reducing the amount of cholesterol that actually ends up in the bloodstream. More specifically, Crestor reduces the overall level of LDL cholesterol (the bad cholesterol) and triglycerides, and raises HDL cholesterol (the good cholesterol). In 2010, the FDA approved the use of Crestor in those without cholesterol problems. The side effects Crestor have been linked to some serious health problems that Crestor lawyers specifically address.
A consumer advocacy group called Public Citizen has called for the removal of Crestor. Public Citizen strongly believes that the effects of Crestor can be deadly. One side effect of Crestor is Rhabdomyolysis. When someone has Rhabdomyolysis, a large number of their skeletal muscles die. With the skeletal muscles dead, it allows for the release of muscle protein into the bloodstream. The muscle protein is then trapped in the kidneys and affects the filtering process potentially, if not ultimately, leading to kidney failure. Of course, there are also other side effects that may result from taking this drug. Other Crestor side effects include cardiomyopathy, myopathy, necrotizing myopathy, heart attack, type 2 diabetes, sudden cardiac death as a result from potassium released from damaged muscle cells, kidney failure, and death from a heart related condition. With the risk of serious health conditions, a Crestor warning has been issued concerning the people who should not take this drug. A Crestor lawyer will be familiar with the history of this drug and be able to advise you if you have developed any of these side effects and provide guidance on how you should proceed.
`It seems to be obvious that that there is a need for an immediate Crestor recall. If you have developed a Crestor side effect, it is important for you to contact a Crestor attorney immediately. Your lawyer will be able to advise you on what the next step may be in order to achieve a successful Crestor lawsuit.

The post Crestor Attorneys appeared first on Seedol.com.

(April 26, 2011)

(courtesy photo)

Judge John F. Keenan of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected attempts by plaintiffs, who use the medication Fosamax for osteoporosis, to file a three state lawsuit against the product.  The Fosamax lawsuit was filed by the plaintiffs claiming that because they use Fosamax, they are at a higher risk of developing the disease of the jaw called osteonecrosis.  Osteonecrosis (ONJ) occurs when bone tissue dies as a result in an inadequate blood supply flowing into the area and is one of the documented side effects of Fosamax.

The reason for the Federal Judge’s ruling was stated that because he felt that since Fosamax problems can vary with each individual plaintiff, the claims should be handled individually. “As the evidence presented shows that the risk of ONJ varies depending upon a Fosamax user’s unique medical history and the circumstances surrounding his or her use, the Court is not satisfied that the need for the proposed monitoring program could be proven on a class-wide basis,” Judge Kennan held. He also concluded that the request that had been made contained many flaws that made class certification untenable and failed to define a proper class. Another concern that Judge Kennan had pertained to the fact that one representative took Fosamax in 1999 — six years before a warning about ONJ appeared on the drug’s label in 2005, therefore, according to Judge Kennan, “the plaintiff’s claim cannot be considered typical of a class of plaintiffs that will include patients who took Fosamax after 2005 and will have to similarly prove negligence and failure to warn under significantly different circumstances”.

Interestingly, the Fosamax users from Florida, Louisiana and Pennsylvania who had filed the suit, had not yet been diagnosed with ONJ or any other side effects from Fosamax, but the plaintiffs sought a Merck-sponsored fund that would be used to pay for twice-yearly dental exams and consultation.

If you take Fosamax and feel that you may be entitled to damages caused by side effects incurred by its use, you should contact a Fosamax attorney and set up a consultation.

The post Federal Judge’s Ruling on Three-State Lawsuit against Fosamax appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Topomax
is a widely used medication that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Topamax has been prescribed to patients who suffer from migraine headaches and epilepsy. topomax
has been shown to be harmful and especially dangerous for pregnant women.

This has been proven in many studies. Studies have repeatedly shown that pregnant women have a huge risk of delivering children with major birth defects. Scientists have noticed that there is a high rate of babies born with cleft lip, cleft palate, genital defects and many other Topamax Birth Defects. Thus, pregnant women should be extremely careful when using this medication.

Topamax is a very popular drug and was first brought to the market to treat epilepsy, a neurological disorder with symptoms of uncontrolled seizures. The FDA approved the drug as in 2004 for the treatment of migraine headaches as well. Since then, it has become a very popular drug in the United States and widely prescribed by doctors to treat epilepsy, migraines and even bipolar disorder. In the absence of adequate warnings and precautions, many pregnant women were prescribed the drug Topamax, and exposed their unborn babies to a high potential risk of birth defects.
Topamax has been removed from Pregnancy class C to Pregnancy Class D. It is also important to mention recent research on Topamax. Data from the North American Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry showed that children who were born when their mothers consumed Topamax during the first trimester of pregnancy, experienced oral clefts in about 1-4 percent compared to the standard rate of 0.33 percent and 0.55 percent associated with other epilepsy drugs.
Topamax can cause serious birth defects during pregnancy. Parents who have babies that are born with serious birth defects such as cleft lip and cleft palate have a legal right to sue for compensation from the companies that manufacture and sell these drugs. There are several cases of Topamax lawsuit pending in court.

The post Topamax is a widely used medication that was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) appeared first on Seedol.com.

(courtesy photo)

Fosamax
is a medicine prescribed by doctors to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Recent studies have shown that Fosamax may pose a potential hazard to the bones. There are several cases in the United States against the manufacturers of the drug. It is also used to increase bone mass in patients with osteoporosis.

However, this drug has serious side effects. It is important to note that Fosamax, manufactured by Merck & Co, is in a class of drugs called bisphosphonates. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is currently reviewing the reports to see if there is an increased risk of severe acute subtrochanteric femoral fractures, broken bones just below the hip joint in some patients who were on these drugs for several years. In recent years, much attention has been given the drug for its effectiveness and side effects.

A new study has shown that long-term use of Fosamax and other “bone-building” drugs may hinder the patient’s bones to heal properly. As a result, Fosamax users may be at an increased risk of certain types of bone fractures.

Review of research published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma found that nineteen times more patients who took Fosamax experienced stress fractures in leg bones compared with other patients.”We believe that prolonged use of these drugs can suppress the ability of bones to heal,” said Dr. Dean Lorich, one of the leading researchers in the study. “As a consequence, patients with normal stress fractures are not able to properly heal, and minor damage can worsen until serious fractures occur.”

In addition to the increased risk of fractures, possible side effects include a condition known as osteonecrosis of the jaw. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a severe bone disease. Damage and death to areas of jaw bone occur as a result of reduced local blood supply. In recent years, an increased incidence of ONJ has been associated with the use of high dosages of bisphosphonates.
Thus, simply speaking, this drug is now at the center of a controversy. To date, more than 100 people have taken legal action against Merck, alleging that it failed to adequately research Fosamax or warn of the drug’s serious side effects. Recently, the company filed a petition to have all Fosamax lawsuits centralized before a single judge for pretrial litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. Multidistrict litigation (MDL) for Fosamax cases involving jaw bone death was approved in 2006, and one bellwether trial has already been completed. Fosamax femur fracture injuries were excluded from the jaw bone injury MDL because the two types of injuries are significantly different.

The post Fosamax is a medicine prescribed by doctors to treat osteoporosis in postmenopausal women appeared first on Seedol.com.

(Courtesy Photo)

A Massachusetts man alleged that his meningitis and acute retinal necrosis was caused by the recalled drug, Raptiva, which he used as a medication for his psoriasis.

The Raptiva lawsuit filed on January 10 in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts against the drug makers – Genentech and Xoma – said that Gerald Sylvia, who was diagnosed with psoriasis, was advised by his attending doctor to use Raptiva as a medication for his psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a chronic autoimmune skin disease characterized by reddened, flaky, itchy skin that resembles dry patches. Occasionally, the patches bleed due to irritation and scratching. It is typically found on the elbows, knees, back and the scalp. In 2003, after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of Raptiva, it was welcomed by patients as there are only a few treatments for psoriasis.

In the United States, the prevalence of psoriasis is estimated to be around 2 to 3 percent, and out of those, 35 percent are classified as having moderate to severe psoriasis. However, the slight benefits of Raptiva do not outweigh the many life-threatening side effects of the drug. Sylvia, one of the Raptiva victims, suffered permanent, disabling and horrific injuries from the infections and lost vision in his right eye.

Sylvia accused the drug makers of deceptive marketing, saying that upon knowledge of the risk of infections from Raptiva, Genentech still failed to warn the doctors or patients. The Raptiva lawsuit filed by Sylvia also claims the two companies left a defective drug on the market when they knew safer alternatives were available. In October 2008, the FDA added a black box warning to Raptiva warning against the risk of life-threatening infections, including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML).

However, the sales of Raptiva remained strong, garnering $108 million in its last full year on the market. In 2009, Genentech issued a Raptiva recall in the U.S. after it was linked to three confirmed deaths and one suspected case of PML. It was determined that the risks associated with the drug outweighed any potential benefits in treating psoriasis.

The post Victim Claims Serious Infections Due to Recalled Raptiva appeared first on Seedol.com.

(Courtesy Photo)

Raptiva, genetically known as Efalizumab, is a prescription drug designed to treat psoriasis, a chronic autoimmune disorder that varies in severity from minor localized patches on the skin to complete body coverage.

According to the National Institutes of Health, approximately 7.5 million individuals in the United States are affected by this disease. Researchers said that it can occur in both sexes and at any age, although it most commonly appears for the first time between 15 and 25 years of age.

Raptiva is manufactured by Genentech, a biotechnology corporation headquartered in South San Francisco, California. In 2003, it was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a psoriasis medication. However, use of Raptiva side effects later included a link to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare and usually fatal disease that is characterized by progressive damage or inflammation of the white matter of the brain at multiple locations. As a result, distributions of Raptiva were halted in Europe in February 2009 after several deaths were directly linked to the use of the drug.

Among the most common possible Raptiva side effects that patients may experience within the first 48 hours of administration of the drug include mild headache, chills, fever, nausea, muscle aches, back pain and swelling of the arms and legs. Genentech and the FDA both acknowledged these adverse reactions to the drug, saying that these often gradually stop within the first few weeks of Raptiva treatment. On the other hand, researchers also cautioned about the life-threatening side effects of Raptiva, which include infections, worsening of new forms of psoriasis, disorders that affect the nervous system and PML, which is considered to be the worst of all because it can usually lead to death or severe disability.

On April 8, 2009, Genentech voluntarily recalled all of the Raptiva drugs from the U.S. market. Patients injured after taking Raptiva drug treatment were advised to consult medical professionals and experienced Raptiva attorneys who will evaluate their case and fight to recover compensation for their losses. These experts will be able to assist all Raptiva victims, as well as their surviving family members, to recover compensation for their losses.

The post Raptiva appeared first on Seedol.com.